forum

lanbrown wrote: ↑

21 Apr 2024 02:50

The add-on is limited to 4.1.0 until they release a new version.

What add-on do you mean?
I'm using HA docker version and the Z-Way (actual 4.12) integration since a long time (after was published) - but in this time only for Z-Wave devices...
About the HAOS add-on didn't know...

try to make an Z-Way update, I use 4.1.2 ...

Michael

Try at Raspberry console: dmesg| grep tty there should be something like that: [ 11.835361] usb 1-1.4: cp210x converter now attached to ttyUSB0 [ 11.844992] usb 1-1.4: cp210x converter now attached to ttyUSB1 Have you something else connected at USB ports? And - what is your Z-Way version?

Have you tried with Z-Way at first?

My device is recognized at ttyUSB0 (Z-Wave) / ttyUSB1 (Zigbee).
And it is listening for Zigbee devices.

Michael

Have ordered one at Amazon - it is available in US and Germany.

Hi,

I can only say that OTA update with 3.0.12 is working fine without problems using Z-Way...

It doesn't help you, but looks like not a problem with Z-Uno FW, maybe...

Michael

I made a pull request today for LocalWeather app with added temperature, humidity and wind speed/direction sensors (can be selected).
This can be used in future in automation.
Additional you can select the refresh interval then.

If you have some time you can wait while update is available.

Michael

Yes, you are right of course - I haven't seen that this element is a widget with multiple device values... One simple way could be to create a new HTTP-device and configure it like this: weather_device.jpg Use here the device name of your weather device and your z-way-IP - and insert the Javascript ...

lanbrown wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2023 20:32

That is a very limited use case.

Right.
I would take a Z-UnoG2 and this sensor and make it myself. It is really not hard to do.
The "hardest" work is to find/make/print a case for the sensor

Michael

piet66 wrote: ↑

15 Dec 2023 15:34

Unfortunately, I noticed that the CPU load is constantly increasing, just like in 4.1.0.

Hi,
what tool you have used for this (CPU load table)? (for compare the values)

My htop does not show such high usage - but maybe really depend on the used modules...

Michael