Search found 10 matches
- 09 Nov 2015 13:58
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Orange Pi PC
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8707
Orange Pi PC
I've tried using raZberry with Orange Pi PC, another raspberry-like board. Stuff works fine, but I have noticed a drop in radio range. Places where raspberry+razberry would reach my devices are no longer reachable in orange+razberry setup. I tried to elliminate as many variables as I could, but I'm ...
- 29 Apr 2015 10:44
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Inclusion via node not possible?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14549
Re: Inclusion via node not possible?
My current production setup is 14 Danfoss thermostats and 2 Aeotec repeaters. The setup is, to say the best, very fragile, both due to Danfosses and RaZberry not working as it's supposed to (dropped out a repeater already). I predict the network to be dysfunctional after a week, but I will keep you ...
- 29 Apr 2015 10:40
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: Issue with randomly dead nodes
- Replies: 8
- Views: 16466
Re: Issue with randomly dead nodes
I am currently having the same problem with "Aeotec Z-Wave Range Extender". It did drop out during test a couple of times, but now I have this problem on a remote site, and no amount of magic seems to be able to bring it back. The network is about 14 Danfoss thermostats and 2 Aeotec repeat...
- 18 Mar 2015 21:33
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Inclusion via node not possible?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14549
Re: Inclusion via node not possible?
OK. So, now that I have things worked out, I feel obliged to report what I've come up with. Danfoss 014G0012 loves being directly connected to Z-Way (direct connection). You can place it a hop away - it will miss every 1 or 2 wake-up cycles, sometimes just disappearing altogether. You need to manual...
- 16 Mar 2015 01:58
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Inclusion via node not possible?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14549
Re: Inclusion via node not possible?
I finally got to a place where there is reliably no communication between the Raz and the Danfosses, and yet they will not use the repeater. danfossy.png Device 2 is the Aeon repeater. //update: There seems to be some kind of a problem with the Danfoss thermostats. Some guy at Vera's forum noted tha...
- 15 Mar 2015 23:47
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Inclusion via node not possible?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14549
Re: Inclusion via node not possible?
I tried doing so. Then it got interesting. The repeater got flagged as dead by Raz (mashing buttons in expert interface helped), the 014G0012 reported E5 on the display (no connectivity), and 014G0013 kept on complaining how it has no signal. Not for long. As I forcibly excluded Danfosses (Mark Batt...
- 15 Mar 2015 19:36
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Inclusion via node not possible?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14549
Re: Inclusion via node not possible?
Here's what I did Include the Aeon repeater (Raz's range) Include a Danfoss 014G0013 (thermostat that claims to be "open" and work with all Z-Wave controllers, claims to support NWI and Explorer Frame) - Raz's range Include a Danfoss 014G0012 (claims no support for NWI and Explorer, told b...
- 15 Mar 2015 16:19
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Inclusion via node not possible?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14549
Re: Inclusion via node not possible?
What I have done so far: - Included the Aeon repeater in Raz's range (Force Unsecure Inclusion) - Included the Danfoss in Raz's range (Force Unsecure Inclusion) - Moved the Danfoss out of Raz's range, but in four-meter line-of-sight with the repeater - Ran network reorganization with mains+battery d...
- 15 Mar 2015 15:46
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Inclusion via node not possible?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 14549
Re: Inclusion via node not possible?
I am having the same problem, trying to include a Danfoss thermostat via a Aeon Labs repeater.
- 05 Feb 2015 17:29
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: Protection Set - "Error: Invalid argument" in API
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3778
Protection Set - "Error: Invalid argument" in API
Hello, I am attempting to use the Protection facility on a Danfoss living connect 014G0002 radiator thermostat. What I am trying to achieve, is locking local setpoint changes. I am trying to set state=2,rfState=0 in order to accomplish that. This should be possible, according to a Danfoss doc at htt...