Search found 22 matches
- 05 Oct 2021 01:33
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Razberry firmware update?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4284
Re: Razberry firmware update?
As this card is apparently the 2014-2015 variety, after digging through forum posts I came across an indication that this card's firmware cannot be updated without some sort of hardware flashing tool? Is this still accurate? Have I been aged out of ZWay as a solution?
- 04 Oct 2021 01:49
- Forum: RaZberry
- Topic: Razberry firmware update?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4284
Razberry firmware update?
I am trying to troubleshoot a node that has begun acting weird since the 3.2 updates... in the process I'm trying to "reorganize" the network (Which I'm assuming is a "heal") after having excluded and reincluded the trouble node. It didn't seem to do much, and the "link heal...
- 29 Jul 2020 18:25
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7980
Re: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
Just an aside too, their WF-200+ switches (fan control switches, same generation) are S2 secure and they show up in the log during changes correctly with the 255 value coming back for Supervision Get, so I suspect you are correct and they just have implemented this wrong in this switch firmware. I'v...
- 27 Jul 2020 04:40
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7980
Re: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
I was unable to get the same trick to work with S2. For now I've just included non-secure and used this trick of modifying the NIF it sends before interviewing. I will pass along your assertion that they have implemented Supervision get incorrectly.
- 21 Jul 2020 19:03
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7980
Re: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
Is ZWay using OpenZWave behind the scenes? Is this something I can take up with them?
- 21 Jul 2020 18:52
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7980
Re: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
Any suggestions on what to tell them?
- 17 Jul 2020 19:40
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7980
Re: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
HomeSeer is claiming they are within spec by the way, and are claiming ZWay is implementing incorrectly as they aren't seeing issues from other controllers.
- 17 Jul 2020 19:19
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7980
Re: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
I have three of these switches, currently at 17,18, and 20. 20 is the one I have included with S2 security. 17 and 18 (non-secure) are working with this workaround. 20 (secure) is not (looks like a secure device can't be force interviewed / ignores NIF change, I'm guessing because a secure device sh...
- 16 Jul 2020 00:56
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7980
Re: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
Is there a specific protocol spec I can point at to defend that the HomeSeer firmware is wrong? I don't understand exactly what the issue is here, only that we've essentially removed the Supervision command support from the NIF and it reports fine... but the workaround here doesn't seem to work if I...
- 15 Jul 2020 05:02
- Forum: Discussions in English
- Topic: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7980
Re: HomeSeer WD200+ dimmer report state issue
Wait! It DID work for the NON-S2 security switches, but not the one I have included as a secure switch. Im still seeing this for that one [2020-07-14 22:00:22.867] [zway] Node 20:0 CC SecurityS2: passing S2 Authenticated decrypted packet to application level: [ 6c 02 0d 00 00 ] [2020-07-14 22:00:22....