UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Discussions about RaZberry - Z-Wave board for Raspberry computer
kellyjelly
Posts: 7
Joined: 16 Jan 2015 09:45

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by kellyjelly »

Let's hope we get something this weekend... I was quite surprised when I realized, that the UZB1 is not working with the zwave.me software package. I tried to install/build this morning. So waiting for a week or two is a pain, but okay... I will be patient. Can only get better comapred to a Vera Lite controller.

And yes, coffee is cold... But I can brew a new one anytime and continue waiting.
X3n0
Posts: 8
Joined: 11 Jan 2015 01:18

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by X3n0 »

I am too impatient
oolon
Posts: 5
Joined: 02 Jan 2015 17:54

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by oolon »

My UZB1 arrive today from vesternet, looking forward to the zway software working with it. I was a bit sorry to see it had no Z-Wave+ logo on it.
sdh
Posts: 66
Joined: 25 Feb 2014 11:37

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by sdh »

oolon wrote:My UZB1 arrive today from vesternet, looking forward to the zway software working with it. I was a bit sorry to see it had no Z-Wave+ logo on it.
The one I got 2 weeks back is also bare, no logos or stickers :!:
kellyjelly
Posts: 7
Joined: 16 Jan 2015 09:45

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by kellyjelly »

Maybe the firmware update will do the trick of adding zw+ ...
mamatdv
Posts: 34
Joined: 26 Nov 2014 02:41

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by mamatdv »

@PoltoS : have you got some news about the new firmware ?
User avatar
PoltoS
Posts: 7649
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 19:36

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by PoltoS »

Don't care about the logo. They are white (black ;) labeled.

The f/w was done, now we set up instructions and update infrastructure to make it easy to do.

We apologize, but it is not so fast as we expected.
kellyjelly
Posts: 7
Joined: 16 Jan 2015 09:45

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by kellyjelly »

As long as we get it this Jan, you are within the promised time-window.
mamatdv
Posts: 34
Joined: 26 Nov 2014 02:41

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by mamatdv »

kellyjelly wrote:As long as we get it this Jan, you are within the promised time-window.
It's true. :roll:
kellyjelly
Posts: 7
Joined: 16 Jan 2015 09:45

Re: UZB1 Ubuntu - Bad data - communication failed

Post by kellyjelly »

SO there was v2.0.1 released yesterday? But no mention of UZB support for Z-way.

Code: Select all

22.01.2015 v2.0.1

Z-Wave Plus certified for US (Certification Number ZC10-15010005).

Command Classes:
- FirmwareUpdate progress added.

New Command Classes:
- MeterPulse

New features:
- Allow multi-level form serialization in http.request()

Fixes:
- Queueing made more stable.
- Interview made more stable:
  - does not restart on Wakeup Notification from the device.
  - continue interview on device wakeup.
  - fixed problems with not all sensors rendered for SensorBinary V2.
- Fixed issue with detached threads in http module.
- Proxy can handle URLs with &. Used for some cameras.
- Adopted latest changes in Apple HomeKit.
- Encoding problems with Unicode in JS API.
- Fixed problem with CRC16 and MultiCmd rendered due to corrupted packets from RF.
- Stability fixes.

Home Automation:
- Support for AlarmSensor (used in Fibaro devices and some others) in HA UI.
- Logical Rules module can be triggered by scenes (not only by device change as previously).

UI:
- RGB (SwitchColor CC) added to Z-Wave binding
- Many small improvements in Expert UI
- Small fixes in HA UI

API changes:
- SwitchColor CC now have new dataholder structure (same as other CCs with scales and types)
- Added _ prefix to functions from z-commons library bytes_to_* and *_to_bytes to minimize risk of overload by user functions.
- WebSocket API changed: event type added. Server can filter events based on this type before sending to clients.
Post Reply