Schlage BE469 lock inclusion question

Discussions about RaZberry - Z-Wave board for Raspberry computer
Post Reply
vlad
Posts: 57
Joined: 19 Oct 2016 04:58

Schlage BE469 lock inclusion question

Post by vlad »

RaZberry on ZW0301
Z-Way v.2.2.3
Schlage BE469 fw. 6.8 ( 08/21/2015 )

Inclusion went fine. Lock is working as it suppose to work BUT Door Lock Logging command class is missing.
So, it's impossible to get information of who did open the door...

Question: is it because of lock firmware does not implement this command class or something went wrong with interview process in Z-Way software?

Thanks
User avatar
PoltoS
Posts: 7649
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 19:36

Re: Schlage BE469 lock inclusion question

Post by PoltoS »

Is it listed in the manual? Is it in the device NIF?
CudaNet
Posts: 58
Joined: 10 Jul 2016 22:32

Re: Schlage BE469 lock inclusion question

Post by CudaNet »

vlad
Posts: 57
Joined: 19 Oct 2016 04:58

Re: Schlage BE469 lock inclusion question

Post by vlad »

I'm new to this, so please bear with me. I did request NIF from my lock and here is the answer:

Code: Select all

[2016-10-19 11:28:33.326] [I] [zway] Job 0x60 (Request NIF from a node): Request for node 5 information frame sent
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.505] [D] [zway] RECEIVED: ( 01 0E 00 49 84 05 08 04 40 03 22 72 7A 98 86 42 )
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.506] [D] [zway] SENT ACK
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.506] [I] [zway] Node info received: 5
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.506] [I] [zway] Job 0x60 (Request NIF from a node): Node info received
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.506] [D] [zway] Job 0x60 (Request NIF from a node): success
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.506] [I] [zway] Removing job: Request NIF from a node
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.506] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.data.basicType = 4 (0x00000004)
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.506] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.data.genericType = 64 (0x00000040)
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.507] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.data.specificType = 3 (0x00000003)
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.509] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.data.deviceTypeString = "Secure Keypad"
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.509] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.data.nodeInfoFrame = byte[5]
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.509] [D] [zway]   ( 22 72 7A 98 86 )
[2016-10-19 11:28:34.509] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.data.lastReceived = 0 (0x00000000)
[2016-10-19 11:28:54.686] [D] [zway] Job 0x60: deleted from queue
I am not sure how to interpret this but it only has handful classes: 22 72 7a 98 86.

And I looked everywhere in manuals, only found description of configuration memory (still no indication if logging is possible).

PS: also, I have tried to get back user code but I see that real pincode is replaced with 2A - '*' asterisk char. (I guess for security reasons) Again, who is doing it lock or Z-Way?

Code: Select all

[2016-10-19 12:11:07.599] [I] [zway] Node 5:0 CC Security: Received a secure message
[2016-10-19 12:11:07.599] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.instances.0.commandClasses.152.data.firstPart = **********
[2016-10-19 12:11:07.600] [I] [zway] Node 5:0 CC Security: passing decrypted packet to application level: [ 63 03 02 01 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a 2a ]
[2016-10-19 12:11:07.600] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.instances.0.commandClasses.99.data.2.status = 1 (0x00000001)
[2016-10-19 12:11:07.600] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.instances.0.commandClasses.99.data.2.code = **********
[2016-10-19 12:11:07.600] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.instances.0.commandClasses.99.data.2.hasCode = True
[2016-10-19 12:11:07.601] [D] [zway] SETDATA devices.5.instances.0.commandClasses.99.data.2 = Empty
EDIT Update: well, this lock updates Alarm.data.V1event object with last operation and userID. I guess this is the only way.
User avatar
PoltoS
Posts: 7649
Joined: 26 Jan 2011 19:36

Re: Schlage BE469 lock inclusion question

Post by PoltoS »

No DoorLockLogginf in it. Use Alarm.

The lock is replacing chars by *
Post Reply