I noticed the following tonight when running a network reorganization from the z-way advanced menu:
Node 174 is a virtual node created by a different controller in the network ( that controller does acknowledge that my z-way controller is the primary ).22:42:29 Starting neighbours update 174 Virtual _174
22:42:29 Neighbours update failed 174 Virtual _174
Should z-way be attempting to do a network update for a virtual node?
I wouldn't think so, and nothing in the public z-wave protocol description explicitly states that a controller should ever attempt a network update ( i.e. any/all of the usual ) on a virtual node.
Also, z-way reports a virtual node as being a "Repeater Slave" when you look at the node via Advanced->Configuration. It would be nice to see "Virtual Node" instead, since that is what the node type is referenced as in the "Z-Wave Bridge User Guide".
Cheers,
-- Brian